Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives with the police is always to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, be certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair for the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
A decreased court might not rule against a binding precedent, whether or not it feels that it is unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. If your court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the law evolve, it could either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be performed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed under have experienced opinions filed for them within the final fourteen days. The following information is obtainable for Each and every case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based around the same factual grounds. Whilst a writ under Article 199 here is offered in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but did not persuade the department of his/her innocence.
Because of this, only citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in such-and-these community, without actually offering them an address. Driving within the neighborhood trying to find their phone is probably going to become more frustrating than it’s well worth.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a properly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons owning their character earlier mentioned board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to your Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed into a Government service may be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to accomplish away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to your offender as well as the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the court must make use of the previous court’s decision in applying the legislation. This example of case legislation refers to 2 cases heard during the state court, for the same level.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent and also the case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case regulation by setting a different precedent of higher authority. This may possibly come about several times because the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first from the High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement from the concept of estoppel starting while in the High Trees case.
refers to law that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case law, also known as “common law,” and “case precedent,” provides a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And exactly how they are applied in certain types of case.